 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| People v. Mosley, Court of Appeals No. 04CA0587,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION SIX, May 3, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court committed plain error, and therefore defendant was entitled to a new sexual assault trial, by placing a visual barrier, and easel, between the child victim and defendant while the victim testified in violation of defendant's Confrontation Clause rights and in contravention of the procedures provided in 2003 Colo. Sess. Laws 18-3-413.5.
|
|||||
| People v. Osorio, Court of Appeals No. 05CA1765,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION SIX, May 3, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's postconviction relief motion under Colo. R. Crim. P. 35(c) was properly denied because the trial court's failure to issue its order within 60 days did not deprive it of jurisdiction and his ineffective assistance of counsel claims regarding, inter alia, voir dire and cross-examination were conclusory and lacked supporting detail.
|
|||||
| People v. Tolbert, Court of Appeals No. 05CA1836,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION THREE, May 3, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendant pled guilty to attempted sexual assault, the order denying his second postconviction motion challenging his parole term was vacated because, inter alia, the sentence was illegal if it imposed a mandatory parole term and the law of the case doctrine, rather than an absolute bar, applied to successive Colo. R. Crim. P. 35(a) motions.
|
|||||
| Phillips v. Watkins, Court of Appeals No. 06CA0767,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION ONE, May 3, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In his litigation against employees of the Colorado Department of Corrections, inmate filed a motion pursuant to Colo. Rev. Stat. § 13-16-111 for recovery of costs. Trial court found that all parties had prevailed to some degree. Denial of motion was not error because trial court correctly determined that it retained discretion to award costs.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
