 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| People v. Spalsbury, Case No. 04PDJ080,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, PRESIDING DISCIPLINARY JUDGE, April 12, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The attorney's suspension from the practice of law was appropriate where he failed to pay court-ordered child support and where there was evidence that he acted willfully in violation of Colo. R. Prof. Conduct 3.4(c).
|
|||||
| People v. Rider, 04PDJ077,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, PRESIDING DISCIPLINARY JUDGE, April 13, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Attorney was disbarred where he committed misconduct, Colo. R. Prof. Conduct 8.4, by knowingly misappropriating $ 148,000 from the estate of an ill and elderly woman, over eight years, and while acting as her conservator.
|
|||||
| Keller v. Koca, Case No. 04SC304,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, April 18, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a negligent supervision claim, employer did not owe a duty to a girl who was sexually assaulted at business because employer's knowledge of the risk was not linked to the harm. Although the employer knew there was a history of sexual behavior directed at employees, plaintiff was not an employee and the assault occurred when business was closed.
|
|||||
| People v. Canister, Case No. 03SA170,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, April 18, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A Colorado statute that only applied to two individuals and allowed for the imposition of the death penalty without a jury trial was found unconstitutional on the grounds that it contravened the Colorado Constitution's prohibition on special legislation.
|
|||||
| People v. Hagos, No. 03SA271,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, April 18, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a capital murder case, district court did not err in granting defendant's motion for a life sentence because legislature's enactment of Colo. Rev. Stat. ¿ 18-1.4-102(1)(e) (2002) was an unconstitutional violation of Colo. Const. art. V, ¿ 25; statute pertaining to sentencing was only applicable to this defendant and one other defendant.
|
|||||
| People v. Madden, Case No. 03SC771,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, April 18, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Description of attempted third degree sexual assault, Colo. Rev. Stat. ¿ 18-2-101; 18-3-404(1.5), provided by information was sufficient to allow defendant to prepare a defense against offense as described in jury instructions. There was no evidence of payment in exchange for sex to support conviction for attempted patronizing a prostituted child.
|
|||||
| People v. Smith, No. 04PDJ095,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, PRESIDING DISCIPLINARY JUDGE, April 19, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
