 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| People v. Ochoa-Magana, Court of Appeals No. 00CA0057,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION THREE, April 26, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where an interpreter was provided to the defendant at a providency hearing, the trial court had no duty to advise the defendant that he could use the interpreter's services to communicate with his attorney.
|
|||||
| Risen v. Cucharas Sanitation & Water Dist., Court of Appeals No. 00CA1067,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION THREE, April 26, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Sanitation and water district had legal authority to compel property owners to connect to district's system and to charge them associated fees; district made a valid legislative determination of public health necessity.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
