 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| People v. Smith, Case Number: 05PDJ072,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, PRESIDING DISCIPLINARY JUDGE, May 18, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Attorney was suspended for 1 year and 1 day for violating Colo. R. Prof. Conduct 1.3, 1.4(a) and (b), 1.5(a) and (b), and 8.4(c), for, inter alia, failing to advise clients in writing of basis of his fees, failing to perform meaningful services or communicate with his clients regarding limited work he performed, and collecting and keeping the fees.
|
|||||
| Stevinson Imps., Inc. v. City & County of Denver, Court of Appeals No.: 04CA2644,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION THREE, May 18, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Order reversing and remanding a hearing officer's decision upholding the assessment of sales tax against plaintiff car dealership was affirmed because the hearing officer's conclusion that the registration address for a business vehicle had to be a business location was contrary to the plain language of Colo. Rev. Stat. § 42-6-139(2)(b).
|
|||||
| Wilson v. Prentiss, Court of Appeals No.: 04CA2435,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION TWO, May 18, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of former husband and property lessor in a partition action by former wife. Wife had standing to bring the action outside of the marital dissolution proceedings, she had standing to claim husband's unjust enrichment, and there was no basis for finding she came before court with unclean hands.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
