 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Aisenberg v. Andrews (In re Title 2005-2006 #75), Case No. 06SA63,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, May 22, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The title and submission clause for an initiative that would alter the term length and number of terms that judges could serve was fair, clear, and accurate in accordance with Colo. Const. art. V, § 1(5.5) and Colo. Rev. Stat. §§ 1-40-106 and 1-40-106.5 (2005) because the initiative did not contain a provision for cutting short existing terms.
|
|||||
| In re Title Ballot Title and Submission Clause and Summary for 2005-2006 # 73, Case No. 06SA42,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, May 22, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An action by the Ballot Title Setting Board in fixing a title, ballot title and submission clause, and summary for a ballot initiative for the 2006 general election was affirmed because the initiative in question did not address multiple subjects in violation of Colo. Const. art. V, § 1(5.5).
|
|||||
| Ausfahl v. Caldara (In re Title for 2005-2006 # 74), Case No. 06SA41,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, May 30, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Colorado Ballot Title Setting Board action in fixing a title and a ballot title and submission clause for a ballot initiative for a general election was reversed because the Board should have refused to fix the titles as the proposed initiative violated the single-subject limitation under Colo. Const. art. V, § 1(5.5).
|
|||||
| Musick v. Woznicki, Case No. 05SC364,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, May 30, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgment of the Court of Appeals of Colorado to dismiss an appeal was affirmed because a trial court ruling that was subject to Colo. R. Civ. P. 54(b) certification, but which was not yet certified, did not constitute a final judgment for the purposes of appeal.
|
|||||
| People v. Wood, Case No. 05SA251,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, May 30, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's statement were made during a custodial interrogation under the Fifth Amendment where the detective should have know that his words and actions of encouraging defendant to provide a narrative of events as soon as the detective was able to dispense of some forms, were reasonably likely to elicit an incriminating response.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
