 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| People v. Knott, Court of Appeals No. 01CA1852,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION TWO, May 22, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's contention, that the court lacked jurisdiction to resentence her to a term of probation after she was released from community corrections, was rejected, as defendant's resentencing proceedings were initiated before her release date.
|
|||||
| Vigil v. Franklin, Court of Appeals No. 01CA2172,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION FOUR, May 22, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a premises liability negligence action, trial court did not err in granting summary judgment for defendants to the extent that it based its ruling on the determination that defendants had no duty to warn plaintiff of open and obvious dangers.
|
|||||
| Wheeler v. T.L. Roofing, Inc., Court of Appeals No. 02CA0713,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION ONE, May 22, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because the individual succeeded on the merits of his claim for breach of warranty, he was entitled to fees and costs pursuant to the express language of the fee-shifting provision. The order of the lower court was affirmed.
|
|||||
| Wolford v. Pinnacol Assur., Court of Appeals No. 01CA2415,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION THREE, May 22, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where an employee pled guilty to making a fraudulent statement regarding her employment in order to receive temporary total disability benefits, she forfeited her right to receive any further benefits under the Colorado Workers' Compensation Act.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
