 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Arteaga-Lansaw v. People, Case No. 05SC763,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, May 21, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Woman's statements to agent after she discovered cashed checks were clearly testimonial, as she was reporting crime that had taken place days, if not weeks, before; because there was no suggestion that defendant had opportunity to cross-examine woman with regard to statements, their admission at trial violated Sixth Amendment confrontation right.
|
|||||
| Hodges v. People, Case No. 05SC682,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, May 21, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although the trial court violated the Office of Alternate Defense Counsel (OADC) statute, Colo. Rev. Stat. §§ 21-2-101 to -106, when it appointed alternate defense counsel who was not on the OADC's list of approved attorneys, reversal of defendant's convictions was not warranted because the error did not violate any cognizable right of defendant's.
|
|||||
| People v. Flippo, Case No. 05SC794,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, May 21, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because defendant had not complied with Colo. Rev. Stat. § 16-8-107(3)(b), proposed expert testimony that due to his intellectual disability, defendant was highly suggestible under interrogation was properly excluded. The case was remanded for determination of whether lay opinion testimony was wrongfully excluded.
|
|||||
| People v. Jones, 07PDJ033,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, PRESIDING DISCIPLINARY JUDGE, May 22, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| People v. Morgan, 07PDJ009,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, PRESIDING DISCIPLINARY JUDGE, May 23, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
