 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| People v. Andersen, Nos. 99PDJ033 (consolidated with 99PDJ066 and 99PDJ126),
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, PRESIDING DISCIPLINARY JUDGE, July 21, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Respondent was ordered disbarred; respondent's acts of forgery and theft, a conviction in California for auto theft, and failure to represent clients demonstrated respondent were dishonest and not sufficiently trustworthy to practice law.
|
|||||
| Colorado Dep't of Health Care Policy & Fin. v. Estate of Roberts, No. 99CA1066,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION ONE, August 3, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Colorado law limiting the funding of disability trusts from assets received in personal injury actions only was not preempted by federal Medicaid law instructing the states on how to count assets in such trusts.
|
|||||
| Littlefield v. Bamberger, No. 99CA1780,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION A, August 3, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendants, who were notified of the entry of judgments by mail, were entitled to the three-day extension of time to file their post-trial motions, thus, the appellate court reinstated their appeal as timely.
|
|||||
| People Ex Rel M.H., No. 99CA2153,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION FIVE, August 3, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court has discretion to consider mother's incarceration, length of child's placement in foster care, excessive use of alcohol, and general neglect, in determining that mother was unfit parent.
|
|||||
| People v. Calderon, No. 98CA1067,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION A, August 3, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because defendant's concurrent sentences imposed plus mandatory parole period were within range of sentences defendant was advised he was at risk of receiving, any deficiency in parole advisement was harmless.
|
|||||
| People v. Frank, No. 98CA1735,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION THREE, August 3, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant in physical custody of federal authorities while serving time in federal prison and concurrently serving state sentence, also in custody of state department of corrections, and thus, entitled to hearing on earned-time credits.
|
|||||
| People v. Wright, No. 99CA1119,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION THREE, August 3, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Legal expenses incurred by a victim in attempting to recover his collateral were properly awarded as restitution. Once defendant had begun serving imposed sentence, increasing restitution amount violated double jeopardy.
|
|||||
| Teneyck v. Roller Hockey Colo., No. 99CA1215,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION FOUR, August 3, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Premises liability statute provided the sole means of recovery for plaintiff against landowner and, in absence of specific law precluding hockey spectator from suing, it was err for the trial court to apply "no duty" rule.
|
|||||
| Goff v. People, No. 00PDJ023,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, PRESIDING DISCIPLINARY JUDGE, August 4, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Attorney's petition for reinstatement to the practice of law after six-month suspension was denied because attorney failed to prove that he was rehabilitated, had complied with disciplinary orders, and was fit to practice law.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
