Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free! Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free! While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
	State Courts - Colorado - May 31, 2007
	Safeco Ins. Co. v. Westport Ins. Corp., Court of Appeals No.: 05CA2389, COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION ONE, May 31, 2007, Decided View this case - free   Overview: In an insurer's action against carriers of other drivers in a chain-reaction car accident for pro rata contribution, the insurer's claim was not time barred as the mandatory arbitration and one-year statute of limitations provisions of former Colo. Rev. Stat. § 10-4-717 did not apply to its claim under former Colo. Rev. Stat. § 10-4-707(3). Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Sheridan Redevelopment Agency v. Knightsbridge Land Co., L.L.C., Court of Appeals No. 06CA1967, COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION SIX, May 31, 2007, Decided View this case - free   Overview: Court of appeals rejected a landowner's contention that a city deprived them of the opportunity to develop property by failing to comply with Colo. Rev. Stat. § 31-25-107 because another private enterprise was chosen as master developer through a selection process in which the owner participated and which the trial court found to have been proper. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Wall v. City of Aurora, Court of Appeals No. 05CA2456, COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION ONE, May 31, 2007, Decided View this case - free   Overview: In a post-condemnation lawsuit arising from a change in public use, the district court did not err in granting summary judgment in favor of defendant condemnor; the doctrines of claim preclusion and issue preclusion applied, and the condemnees could not revisit the valuation of the property acquired. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Back to Top
	www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us   CopyrightŠ 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.