 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Coors v. Security Life of Denver Ins. Co., Case No. 03SC682,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, May 23, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although the insured failed to establish significant public impact to support his Colorado Consumer Protection Act claim, the insurer's material breach precluded enforcement of an early termination provision, and the record supported a treble damages award under Colo. Rev. Stat. § 13-21-102 for the insurer's willful and wanton conduct.
|
|||||
| Farmers Reservoir & Irrigation Co. v. City of Golden, Case No. 02SA298,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, May 23, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Attorney fees were properly awarded to appellee city in appellants' declaratory action seeking interpretation of 1960s decrees concerning water rights where appellants asserted a groundless judicial estoppel claim, appellee devoted at least 25 percent of its time to that issue, and the fees were reasonable and necessary.
|
|||||
| Lopez v. People, Case No. 04SC150,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, May 23, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendant was convicted of vehicular homicide during deferral of his sentence for possession, vehicular homicide conviction was proper Blakely-exempt aggravating factor under Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-1.3-401(6) for deferred possession sentence because facts were reflected in jury's verdict that was entered before deferred sentence.
|
|||||
| People v. Madera, Case No. 04SA213,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, May 31, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: When defendant alleged ineffective assistance of counsel, trial court erred in ruling that defense counsel was required to turn over his file for in camera review, however, defendant did not waive privileges entirely because trial court's order was premature.
|
|||||
| People v. Rodriguez, Case No. 04SC219,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, May 31, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: As Colo. Const. art. II, § 23, extended the right to a jury of 12 only to felony offenses, and defendant had been charged only with misdemeanors, a district court erred by reversing his county court conviction on grounds he was afforded only a jury of six under Colo. R. Crim P. 23(a)(2) and Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-1-406(1) (2004).
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
