 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Close v. People, Case No. 00SC690,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, May 28, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A defendant sentenced under crime of violence statute was entitled, upon request, to abbreviated proportionality review of his sentences. Because defendant's sentences were not grossly disproportionate to his offenses, his sentences were affirmed.
|
|||||
| Kerns v. Kerns, Case No. 02SA59,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, May 28, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The supreme court held that Minnesota action to impose a constructive trust upon various ranch facilities was actually one affecting title to real property. Thus, petitioners were entitled to file a notice of lis pendens against Colorado real estate.
|
|||||
| People v. Deroulet, Case No. 00SC626,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, May 28, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendant was convicted of burglary, assault, theft, and of being habitual criminal, and court conducted a proportionality review, although defendant was entitled to abbreviated proportionality review, it was error to reduce the sentence.
|
|||||
| People v. R.L.C., Case No. 01SC530,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, May 28, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Father was not permitted to move for genetic testing almost 11-years after a final judgment of paternity was entered, and such testing would not be in the child's best interest.
|
|||||
| Brush Grocery Kart, Inc. v. Sure Fine Mkt., Inc., Case No. 01SC267,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, June 3, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where a hail storm damaged commercial property during litigation between the buyer and seller over the purchase price of said property, the buyer was entitled to the remedy of specific performance and a price abatement for damages.
|
|||||
| Grant v. People, No. 00SC799,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, June 3, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although police failed to inform defendant or parents about statutory written waiver provisions that necessitated second interview, there was no question about whether defendant sought to waive right or whether he disputed contents of waiver.
|
|||||
| Silva v. Basin Western, Inc., No. 01SA303,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, June 3, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where companies petitioned for relief from trial court order compelling production of discovery regarding insurance reserves and settlement authority in personal injury suit, reserves and settlement authority were not relevant to underlying suit.
|
|||||
| Whitaker v. People, Case No. 00SC866,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, June 3, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Possession with intent to distribute over 1,000 grams of methampetamine was affirmed when the statute did not apply a culpable mental state to the quantity of drugs distributed, manufactured, dispensed, sold, or possessed.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
