 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Williams v. People, CASE NO. 01SC342,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, June 12, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| City of Colorado Springs v. Powell, No. 01SC87,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, June 17, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: State supreme court held that governmental immunity act permitted family to sue for injuries to minor sons, where alleged injuries resulted from act or omission that was connected to purpose of sanitation facility.
|
|||||
| Columbus Invs. v. Lewis, No. 01SC340,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, June 17, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because the owners of property assigned all their right and interest in the property to a bank, which included the owners' right to receive notification of the issuance of an impending tax deed, the owners were not entitled to such notice.
|
|||||
| People v. Powers, No. 01SA340,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, June 17, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: State's interlocutory appeal challenging the suppression of evidence was dismissed when in order to toll the 10-day period for filing an interlocutory appeal, a motion to reconsider a suppression order had to be filed within the same time limit.
|
|||||
| Vanderbeek v. Vernon Corp., No. 00SC960,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, June 17, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Corporation was entitled to consequential damages due to wrongful attachment of its funds; corporation could recover the money it spent due to a higher stock price, but could not recover damages for potential lost profit on stock not purchased.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
