 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Brown v. Silvern, Court of Appeals No. 00CA1126,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION FIVE, June 21, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment was reversed because there was a disputed issue of material fact as to the length of the attorney-client relationship, and whether the attorney's failure to obtain consent before settling was a proximate cause of client's injury.
|
|||||
| Chavez v. Parkview Episcopal Med. Ctr., Court of Appeals No. 00CA0739,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION ONE, June 21, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The trial court was correct in failing to reduce patient's noneconomic damages to the statutory cap before apportioning damages between hospital and pump manufacturer because the cap only applied to health care institutions.
|
|||||
| People v. Haghshenas, Court of Appeals No. 00CA0436,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION ONE, June 21, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where man was arrested for controlled substance felonies, he posted bond, he failed to appear in court, and he was incarcerated in another state, it was error to find that incarceration in other state did not exonerate him.
|
|||||
| People v. Medina, Court of Appeals No. 99CA0980,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION FIVE, June 21, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Second degree murder conviction affirmed where court correctly suppressed statements made to the police, but admitted defendant's statements to his wife from jail, to show consciousness of guilt.
|
|||||
| People v. R.L.C. (ex rel J.A.U.), Court of Appeals No. 00CA1487,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION ONE, June 21, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Order denying father's motion for genetic testing was reversed; state law provided that upon the motion of the court or any interested party to a paternity proceeding, genetic testing would be ordered and the results received into evidence.
|
|||||
| People v. Simpson, Court of Appeals No. 00CA0475,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION FIVE, June 21, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court did not take sufficient steps to ensure the effective waiver of 17-year-old defendant's constitutional rights where defendant proceeded pro se without presence of a parent or guardian; therefore, his guilty plea was vacated.
|
|||||
| People v. Smith, Court of Appeals No. 99CA2022,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION FIVE, June 21, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The plain language of the sex offender lifetime supervision act gave the district court the option to impose an increased minimum sentence, and it was not error to impose incarceration because it considered the relevant factors.
|
|||||
| Public Serv. Co. v. Indus. Claim Appeals Office, Court of Appeals No. 00CA1991,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION FOUR, June 21, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: On review, the court affirmed the decision of an administrative law judge to award unapportioned medical impairment benefits to claimant based upon a whole person impairment rating of 23 percent.
|
|||||
| Thornbury v. Allen, Court of Appeals No. 00CA1533,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION ONE, June 21, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Employee's cleaning of landowner's condominium was work that met the test of routineness, regularity, and importance as part of landowner's regular business, therefore employee's sole remedy was workers' compensation.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
