 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| People v. Leonard, Court of Appeals No. 06CA0405,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION THREE, July 12, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court's restitution order of $ 83,199.46 to seven farmers and merchants for the seed they had delivered to defendant was based on a proper assessment of the actual damages resulting from defendant's criminal conduct, because defendant obtained possession of the commodities by purporting to act as a licensed commodity handler.
|
|||||
| People v. Wallin, Court of Appeals No. 04CA1011,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION SIX, July 12, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a second degree assault case, a trial court did not err by admitting expert testimony relating to domestic violence under Colo. R. Evid. 702 because it helped the jury understand the inconsistencies in the victim's stories; moreover, the probative value of the evidence was not substantially outweighed by any unfair prejudicial effect.
|
|||||
| Trappers Lake Lodge & Resort, LLC v. Colo. Dept of Revenue, Court of Appeals No. 06CA0491,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION FIVE, July 12, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Revocation of the liquor licenses was affirmed because the right to revoke a license existed at least as of the date of the alleged violation and the Colorado Liquor Code contained no corresponding language ending that authority, and the revocations were not mooted merely because the licenses would have otherwise expired.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
