 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Dee Enters. v. Indus. Claim Appeals Office, Court of Appeals No. 02CA2040,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION ONE, July 31, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Provisions of the Workers' Compensation Act conferring jurisdiction on ALJs to hear workers' compensation cases and providing the Industrial Claim Appeals Office with jurisdiction to review the ALJs' orders did not violate the Colorado Constitution.
|
|||||
| In re Marriage of Mohrlang, Court of Appeals No. 02CA0360,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION FOUR, July 31, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A marital dissolution action was remanded to the trial court to reconsider whether the value of the husband's trust interest in stock should have been discounted because of the delay in husband's receiving his interest.
|
|||||
| Larry H. Miller Corp.-Denver v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, Court of Appeals No. 02CA0545,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION FOUR, July 31, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where revised off-ramp caused flooding, assuming structure was a water or sanitation facility under the Colorado Governmental Immunity Act, county was required to exercise reasonable care to correct condition, and matter was remanded on that issue.
|
|||||
| Major Med. Ins. Fund v. Indus. Claim Appeals Office of Colo., Court of Appeals No. 02CA1846,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION FOUR, July 31, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Claimant's failure to seek review of 1994 order denying benefits for prescriptions did not close the claim, and statute of limitations on reopening was not applicable. Panel correctly determined that the MMIF was liable for cost of the prescriptions.
|
|||||
| People v. Howard, Court of Appeals No. 01CA2465,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION TWO, July 31, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In defendant's criminal prosecution for biting one victim and striking another, the trial court erred by failing to merge the jury's finding of guilt for both second- and third- degree assault of the biting victim.
|
|||||
| Pfantz v. Kmart Corp., Court of Appeals No. 01CA0388,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION TWO, July 31, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a personal injury suit, the court properly imposed sanctions against a department store for pretrial destruction of the bench where the accident occurred. The court refused to set aside the jury's award of future medical expenses to the plaintiff.
|
|||||
| The Brickman Group, Ltd. v. Compass Bank, Court of Appeals No. 02CA1645,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION FIVE, July 31, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A finding against the claimant in an action to foreclose a mechanic's lien was improper, where a blanket lien that omitted property that benefitted from the mechanic's materials and work was valid against the property included in the lien statement.
|
|||||
| Verrier v. Colo. Dep't of Corr., Court of Appeals Nos. 01CA1803 & 01CA2306,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION FOUR, July 31, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Inmate who filed a civil complaint against officials of the Colorado Department of Corrections after he was denied earned time credit for his participation in two inmate vocational programs failed to state a claim.
|
|||||
| People v. Andrews, 02PDJ097,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, PRESIDING DISCIPLINARY JUDGE, August 6, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An attorney committed misconduct, where a client paid the attorney a retainer, the attorney did not maintain a trust account, deposited the retainer into her personal account, and did not refund the unearned portion of the retainer.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
