 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Dawson v. People, Case No. 99SC995,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, July 2, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where trial court failed to advise defendant of mandatory period of parole following his release, error was harmless because period of incarceration plus that of parole fit within sentence defendant risked receiving originally.
|
|||||
| Dike v. People, Case No. 00SC332,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, July 2, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's convictions were affirmed because the district court retained jurisdiction to rescind its initial dismissal until expiration of the time for appeal, and it issued the corrective order one day before the time for appeal expired.
|
|||||
| Hersh Cos. v. Highline Vill. Assocs., Case No. 00SC74,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, July 2, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The contractors' two year statute of limitations did not apply to a breach of warranty claim against a painter who refused to comply with his warranty where apartment owner filed suit more than two years after discovery of the defect.
|
|||||
| Hoffler v. Colo. Dep't of Corr., Case No. 00SC116,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, July 2, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Terminated state employee's recanted statements in the course of an investigation that a co-employee had sexually harassed her were not protected by common law privilege and could be used in disciplinary proceedings brought against her.
|
|||||
| Pub. Serv. Co. v. Pub. Utilities Comm'n, Case No. 00SA24,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, July 2, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Utility company failed to meet its burden of proof that the regulatory agency's actions were unlawful. The agency acted within its authority. Its decision was just and reasonable and it was supported by substantial evidence.
|
|||||
| Pub. Serv. Co. v. Van Wyk, Case No. 99SC783,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, July 2, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Utility commission's approval of line upgrades did not preclude inverse condemnation, trespass, and nuisance claims, and while allegations of intangible invasions did not support condemnation or trespass claims, the nuisance claim survived.
|
|||||
| Rogers v. Westerman Farm Co., Case No. 99SC293,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, July 2, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Costs incurred to make natural gas marketable were to be borne solely by lessees, while costs incurred subsequent to gas being marketable were to be shared proportionately between lessees and lessors. Marketability of gas was a question of fact.
|
|||||
| Young v. People, Case No. 00SC240,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, July 2, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where trial court failed to advise defendant of mandatory period of parole following his release, error was harmless because period of incarceration plus that of parole fit within sentence defendant risked receiving originally.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
