 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Bd. of County Comm'rs v. City of Greenwood Village, Court of Appeals No. 00CA1634,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION FOUR, July 5, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: District court did not abuse its discretion when it found that a city could properly annex a lot by dividing it into one foot strips in order to meet the Annexation Act's contiguity requirements.
|
|||||
| In re Marriage of Foss, Court of Appeals No. 00CA0372,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION A, July 5, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Mother's underemployment was not voluntary and was done to meet the special non-financial needs of the party's minor child, therefore imputation of income to mother was an abuse of the trial court's discretion.
|
|||||
| Mortgage Invs. Corp. v. Battle Mt. Corp., Court of Appeals No. 99CA2111,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION FIVE, July 5, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The trial court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of the mortgagee and in striking the mortgagors' pleadings because the mortgagee's claim was not timely filed under the applicable statute of limitations.
|
|||||
| People ex rel. A.R.D., Court of Appeals No. 00CA0600,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION TWO, July 5, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court did not err in finding that it had authority in a probate proceeding to address parenting time issues where the issues were incidental to its authority to appoint a guardian.
|
|||||
| People ex rel. Garner v. Garner, Court of Appeals No. 00CA1528,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION THREE, July 5, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellate court lacked jurisdiction to hear an appeal from a magistrate where father sought review of denial of a motion for declaratory judgment relating to child support, but did not first seek review of that order by a district court judge.
|
|||||
| People v. Chavez, Court of Appeals No. 00CA1211,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION THREE, July 5, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendant was sentenced to community corrections, and later resentenced to DOC and three years of mandatory parole, his double jeopardy rights were not violated as he had no legitimate expectation in the finality of his original sentence.
|
|||||
| Singh v. Mortensun, Court of Appeals No. 00CA0737,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION ONE, July 5, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court abused its discretion when it refused to set aside an entry of default against father who posted defamatory material on website where he provided good faith explanation for default and he had a potentially meritorious defense.
|
|||||
| Weston v. Cassata, Court of Appeals No. 99CA2449,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION ONE, July 5, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Welfare benefit recipients had a limited property right in continued receipt of benefits and were constitutionally entitled to procedural due process. Deficient sanction notices deprived plaintiffs of due process of law.
|
|||||
| People v. Cardwell, Case No.: 00PDJ074,
Supreme Court of Colorado, Presiding Disciplinary Judge, July 11, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Attorney who did not disclose to judge taking client's DUI plea that another DUI case was pending in another county was suspended for 3 years, with 18 months suspended due to delay. Attorney's convictions established intent.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
