 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Aller v. Law Office of Carole C. Schriefer, Court of Appeals No.: 04CA0003,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION ONE, July 28, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In suit brought against attorney by former client claiming breach of fiduciary duty, summary judgment was properly granted to the attorney with respect to the claim for emotional distress and other noneconomic damages because such damages were not available in the instant legal malpractice action which was essentially based on claim of negligence.
|
|||||
| Estates in Eagle Ridge, LLLP v. Valley Bank & Trust, Court of Appeals No.: 03CA2270,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION FOUR, July 28, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: There were no due process concerns where debtors' claim of insufficient notice arose out of their own failure to comply with change of address requirements in deed of trust and thus court did not err in granting summary judgment to bank in its foreclosure proceeding including its application for an order authorizing sale under Colo. R. Civ. P. 120.
|
|||||
| People ex rel. J.L., Court of Appeals No.: 04CA2616,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION FOUR, July 28, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where a mother denied the allegations in the petition and demanded a jury, the trial court erred when it entered a dispositional order in the dependency and neglect proceeding without first holding an adjudicatory hearing and entering an order adjudicating the child dependent and neglected as required by Colo. Rev. Stat. ¿ 19-3-507(1)(a) (2004).
|
|||||
| People ex rel. M.T., Court of Appeals No.: 05CA0733,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION ONE, July 28, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The termination of the mother's parental rights was proper pursuant to Colo. Rev. Stat. ¿ 19-3-604(1)(c)(I)(A) (2004) where she was not in reasonable compliance with and had not been successful under the treatment plan. Further, alternative relative placements were not appropriate for the children.
|
|||||
| People v. Hinojos-Mendoza, Court of Appeals No.: 03CA0645,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION TWO, July 28, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Admission of laboratory report on a block of cocaine found in defendant's truck after an informant set up a drug buy did not violate defendant's confrontation right because the report was not "testimonial" and thus the Crawford rule did not require exclusion, and it was admissible under hearsay business record exception in Colo. R. Evid. 803(6).
|
|||||
| People v. Lehnert, Court of Appeals No.: 02CA2186,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION TWO, July 28, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Attempted first degree murder conviction was reversed because there was insufficient evidence to show defendant took a substantial step toward the completion of the offense, when she was arrested before she took any substantial step beyond preparation, as no bomb was fully constructed, nor was a bomb placed in the proximity of the intended victim.
|
|||||
| People v. Lopez, Court of Appeals No.: 03CA0049,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION FIVE, July 28, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's convictions for sexual assault on a child by one in a position of trust and sexual assault on a child as part of a pattern of abuse were proper pursuant to Colo. R. Evid. 404(b) where the detective's testimony about "another victim" was not so inflammatory that the jury could not disregard it.
|
|||||
| People v. Perea, Court of Appeals No.: 03CA1750,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION FIVE, July 28, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Conviction of possession of a schedule II controlled substance was affirmed because the appellate court construed Colo. Rev. Stat. ¿ 18-18-405 (2004) to require only that a person know that he or she possessed a controlled substance and not that he or she know the precise controlled substance possessed.
|
|||||
| Seefried v. Hummel, Court of Appeals No.: 04CA0960,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION A, July 28, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court had not erred when it held statements which gave rise to two church pastors' claims of, inter alia, breach of contract and defamation were issued within the "constitutionally protected context" of the First Amendment because they had occurred during a church meeting that concerned the investigation, discipline, and discharge of the pastors.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
