 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Fisher v. Barnes (In re Estate of Dancer), No. 99CA0537,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION THREE, October 12, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Legatee did not met his burden of proving that will reflected testator's intent, notwithstanding harmless error statute that allowed admission to probate wills which were not formally executed or met holographic will requirements.
|
|||||
| People ex rel. B.W., No. 99CA1564,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION ONE, October 12, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-4-116(4) permitted retroactive child support to the date of the child's birth, thereby placing the same burden upon married and unmarried parents. The statute therefore did not violate equal protection.
|
|||||
| People v. Koehler, No. 98CA2166,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION FOUR, October 12, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Portion of sentence which required defendant to serve mandatory parole was vacated and remanded for resentencing to discretionary parole for a period that did not exceed balance of the originally imposed sentence to prison.
|
|||||
| People v. Lesslie, No. 99CA1048,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION THREE, October 12, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant sought review of the District Court of Hinsdale County (Colorado) decision denying his Colo. R. Crim. P. 35(c) motion, claiming counsel was ineffective and admissions were inadmissible because of attorney-client privilege.
|
|||||
| People v. Martinez, No. 99CA1325,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION THREE, October 12, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Voir dire regarding death penalty was permissible to determine bias, even when jurors' duty was to determine guilt or innocence. The trial court did not abuse it discretion in admitting evidence of gang membership as res gestae.
|
|||||
| People v. Rogers, No. 99CA1444,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION FIVE, October 12, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Driver was not entitled to set aside or modify restitution under no-fault insurance where the restitution was ordered as part of a criminal proceeding.
|
|||||
| Prefer v. PharmNetRx, L.L.C., No. 99CA0650,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION TWO, October 12, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Dismissal of employee's claims for failure to disclose specific information was not an abuse of discretion, but company was not entitled to retain possession of replevied property because replevin order was not permanent.
|
|||||
| Steamboat Springs Rental & Leasing, Inc. v. City & County of Denver, No. 99CA1838,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION FIVE, October 12, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Dismissal of plaintiff's appeal of sales tax assessment was affirmed, based on res judicata.
|
|||||
| Sullivan v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office, No. 99CA2203,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION FOUR, October 12, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A claimant's status as employee for purposes of workers' compensation coverage, when he is acting as member of National Guard, depends on whether he is engaged in active service, pursuant to call for action by governor or president.
|
|||||
| Vanderbeek v. Vernon Corp., No. 99CA1214,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION TWO, October 12, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Wrongful attachment damages awarded to defendant limited to the additional amounts paid for common shares earmarked to be, and actually, bought, and not more speculative lost profits on shares earmarked to be, but never actually, bought.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
