 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Baldauf v. Roberts, Court of Appeals No. 00CA1719,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION ONE, July 19, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Administrative decision placing the defendant in administrative segregation was a quasi-judicial function of the Department of Corrections and subject to review under the rules of civil procedure.
|
|||||
| Carney v. Civil Serv. Comm'n, Court of Appeals No. 00CA0144,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION THREE, July 19, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Portion of police promotional exam scoring system was arbitrary and capricious where there was no record of how evaluators reached their decision, what criteria they applied, or whether such criteria were applied to all applicants equally.
|
|||||
| In re C.J.S., Court of Appeals No. 00CA1048,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION TWO, July 19, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In non-parent custody proceeding, order awarding mother parenting time was proper because court was aware of child's wishes, and it was in child's best interest. Attorney fee award was upheld because mother had standing, and amount was equitable.
|
|||||
| In re Marriage of Parsons, Court of Appeals No. 00CA0997,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION TWO, July 19, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In post-dissolution proceeding, court's order continuing payment of maintenance to wife after her remarriage was proper because parties's unequivocal waiver of right to seek modification as to remarriage satisfied statutory requirements.
|
|||||
| In re Marriage of Quintana, Court of Appeals No. 00CA0889,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION THREE, July 19, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court properly considered social security disability payments received by mother on behalf of the children in calculating child support.
|
|||||
| Kellum v. RE Servs.,LLC, Court of Appeals No. 00CA1143,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION THREE, July 19, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In action concerning redemption of real property sold at foreclosure sale, summary judgment in favor of lien holder was proper as it was undisputed that redemption funds were tendered to and accepted by certificate holder.
|
|||||
| Liberty Heights at Northgate v. Indus. Claim Appeals Office of State & Carol Vawser, Court of Appeals No. 00CA2213,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION TWO, July 19, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Claimant was entitled to further temporary total disability benefits despite the fact that she was at fault for her discharge. Claimant's loss of employment did not constitute a failure to begin modified employment.
|
|||||
| People v. Barringer, Case No.: 99PDJ052,
Supreme Court of Colorado, Presiding Disciplinary Judge, July 19, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where attorney was retained to represent client in workers' compensation claim, attorney charged unreasonable contingency fee, settled claim without client's knowledge, forged client's signature, and spent the money, attorney was disbarred.
|
|||||
| People v. Jensen, Court of Appeals No. 99CA1871,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION TWO, July 19, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: First degree murder conviction was affirmed. The trial court did not err in admitting evidence, including statements made by the victim and a co-defendant, and the prosecutor's comments did not constitute plain error.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
