 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| People v. Patnode, Court of Appeals No.: 03CA1072,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION FOUR, August 11, 2005
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's sentence was improper pursuant to Colo. Rev. Stat. ¿ 42-2-206 (2004) because his two driving offenses did not amount to grave and serious crimes. While the State had a valid interest in preventing drivers from driving with revoked licenses, an offense under the statute was essentially a violation of an administration order.
|
|||||
| People v. Rosales, Court of Appeals No.: 03CA0077,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION ONE, August 11, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Convictions were affirmed because the trial court did not violate defendant's right against double jeopardy when, having deferred determination of the amount of restitution as permitted by Colo. Rev. Stat. ¿ 18-1.3-603(1) (2004), the trial court ordered restitution after defendant began to serve his sentence.
|
|||||
| Remote Switch Sys. v. Delangis, Court of Appeals No. 04CA0575,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION FIVE, August 11, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred in denying the employee an award of attorney fees under former Colo. Rev. Stat. ¿ 8-4-114 because as the "winning party" under the statute, the employee was entitled to an award of attorney fees relating to the prosecution of his counterclaim.
|
|||||
| Sereff v. Steedle, Court of Appeals No.: 03CA1445,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION ONE, August 11, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Determination that a supervising physician was a public employee was affirmed because the policy choice had been made by the Colorado General Assembly that a doctor engaged in private practice was covered by the Colorado Governmental Immunity Act, Colo. Rev. Stat. ¿ 24-10-101 (2004) et seq., when supervising a resident at a private hospital.
|
|||||
| Tuscany, LLC v. W. States Excavating Pipe & Boring, LLC, Court of Appeals Nos.: 03CA0999 & 03CA1852,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION TWO, August 11, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Discharge and release of the mechanics' liens was reversed and remanded because mechanics' liens were excluded from the Spurious Liens and Documents statute, Colo. Rev. Stat. ¿ 38-35-201 (2004) et seq.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
