Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

   State Courts - Colorado - September 9, 2002

  
Alliance Constr. Solutions, Inc. v. Dep't of Corr., Case No. 02SA53, SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, September 9, 2002, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: The attorney-client privilege protected information communicated between an attorney and his client's independent contractor.

Search Cases for Free

  
Hill v. DeWitt (In re Estate of DeWitt), Case No. 01SC136, Case No. 01SC248, SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, September 9, 2002, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Statute could be applied retroactively to revoke revocable rights granted during marriage that dissolved before statute became effective and where insured ex-spouse died after that date. Retroactivity did not apply to beneficiaries or decedents.

Search Cases for Free

  
People v. Diaz, Case No. 02SA156, SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, September 9, 2002, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: In a criminal prosecution, the district court abused its discretion by preventing the prosecution from requesting future nontestimonial identification evidence because of a prior police illegal search and seizure.

Search Cases for Free

  
People v. Stewart, No. 00SC672, SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, September 9, 2002, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Defendant's equal protection rights were not violated when he was convicted of reckless second degree assault because the similar vehicular assault statute did not proscribe the exact same conduct with a lesser penalty as contended by defendant.

Search Cases for Free

  
State Eng'r v. Bradley (In re Water Rights in Rio Grande County), Case No. 01SA295, SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, September 9, 2002, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Grant of an application for a change of water right was reversed and remanded, as the owner failed to meet his burden of proof to show the extent of the historic use of the water right or the lack of injury to other vested water rights.

Search Cases for Free

  
Back to Top