 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Chilcott Entertainment L.L.C. v. John G.Kinnard & Co., No. 99CA1478,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION ONE, August 17, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Absent specific statute, Colorado law did not allow for tolling of limitations statute during pendency of prior action. Filing of federal action did not constitute compliance with limitation requirement of arbitration statute.
|
|||||
| Cooper v. United States Ski Ass'n, No. 99CA0187,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION THREE, August 17, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A release form signed by a parent was enforceable by ski defendants sued in tort following a ski accident.
|
|||||
| Green Tree Fin. Servicing Corp. v. Short, No. 99CA0281,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION A, August 17, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Replevin action accrued October 29, 1992, 20 days after the required notice was given, therefore action filed on October 9, 1998, was within six years of accrual date and within the six-year statute of limitation, so the action was timely.
|
|||||
| Herrera v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office, No. 99CA2399,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION FOUR, August 17, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Workers' compensation statute was intended to preclude school teaching and non-teaching personnel from receiving unemployment compensation during summer recess if they had the promise of work in the fall.
|
|||||
| People v. Fennell, No. 98CA2459,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION FIVE, August 17, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because the federal and state sentences would not have run concurrently as stipulated in the plea agreement, the plea agreement was rendered involuntary and thus, unenforceable against defendant.
|
|||||
| People v. Grant, No. 98CA2099,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION THREE, August 17, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Evidence supported complicity instruction. Because multiple victims were involved, law authorized imposition of consecutive sentences. Juvenile Miranda statute did not require signature on written waiver of parental presence.
|
|||||
| People v. Ramirez, No. 99CA0455,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION FIVE, August 17, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The burglary conviction was reinstated because the pattern jury instruction was sufficient to convey the meaning that the intent to commit a crime had to accompany or coexist with the moment of trespass.
|
|||||
| People v. Vichai Xiong, No. 99CA0278,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION FIVE, August 17, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Mandatory parole was a required part of any sentence by statute; therefore the separate administration of parole by the parole board did not violate defendant's protection against double jeopardy.
|
|||||
| Robinson v. City & County of Denver, No. 98CA2566,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION TWO, August 17, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: There was no prohibition against considering, in connection with hostile work environment claim, evidence tending to prove disparate treatment claim, such that totality of evidence permitted hostile work environment finding.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
