 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Schultz v. Wells, No. 99CA0688,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION THREE, August 17, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The trial court did not abuse its discretion in applying both the Coloardo Rules of Evidence and the Frye test to determine that the expert scientific evidence was inadmissible in plaintiff's action for personal injuries.
|
|||||
| Van Egmond v. Horsman, No. 99CA1399,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION ONE, August 17, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Uniform Commercial Code provision allowing sale of both real and personal property at foreclosure did not apply when the security agreement, separate from the deed of trust securing the real property, covered only personal property collateral.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
