LexisNexis
  
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - Colorado - August 15, 2002

  
People v. Stead, Court of Appeals No. 00CA2212, COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION THREE, August 15, 2002, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: The Internet posting provision of the sex offender registration statute did not constitute additional punishment, thus there was no violation of defendant's right's to a trial by jury and no violation of defendant's due process rights.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Sunstone at Colo. Springs Homeowners Ass'n v. White, Court of Appeals No. 01CA2035, COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION FIVE, August 15, 2002, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Discrepancy between homeowners association name as stated in its articles of incorporation and the name described in the declaration of covenants did not preclude association from enforcing it's declaration and foreclosing on lien against homeowner.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Wisehart v. Meganck, Court of Appeals No. 01CA1327, COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION ONE, August 15, 2002, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: The trial court properly dismissed the bank employee's claims that the bank and his supervisor made up a reason to fire him; he was an at-will employee and they did not need any reason to terminate.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

 www.lexisnexis.com  |  About LexisNexis  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Customer Support  |  Contact Us
  Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.