 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Alliance Constr. Solutions, Inc. v. Dep't of Corr., Case No. 02SA53,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, September 9, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The attorney-client privilege protected information communicated between an attorney and his client's independent contractor.
|
|||||
| Hill v. DeWitt (In re Estate of DeWitt), Case No. 01SC136, Case No. 01SC248,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, September 9, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Statute could be applied retroactively to revoke revocable rights granted during marriage that dissolved before statute became effective and where insured ex-spouse died after that date. Retroactivity did not apply to beneficiaries or decedents.
|
|||||
| People v. Diaz, Case No. 02SA156,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, September 9, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a criminal prosecution, the district court abused its discretion by preventing the prosecution from requesting future nontestimonial identification evidence because of a prior police illegal search and seizure.
|
|||||
| People v. Stewart, No. 00SC672,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, September 9, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's equal protection rights were not violated when he was convicted of reckless second degree assault because the similar vehicular assault statute did not proscribe the exact same conduct with a lesser penalty as contended by defendant.
|
|||||
| State Eng'r v. Bradley (In re Water Rights in Rio Grande County), Case No. 01SA295,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, September 9, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Grant of an application for a change of water right was reversed and remanded, as the owner failed to meet his burden of proof to show the extent of the historic use of the water right or the lack of injury to other vested water rights.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
