 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Colo. State Bd. of Med. Exam'Rs v. Ogin, Court of Appeals No. 01CA1508,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION ONE, September 12, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a license revocation proceeding, substantial evidence supported the board of medical examiners' decision that no reasonable accommodation could have been made that would have permitted doctor to practice medicine while ensuring patient safety.
|
|||||
| Costilla County Conservancy Dist. v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, Court of Appeals No. 01CA1171,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION FIVE, September 12, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The trial court erred in granting summary judgment for appellee board, in appellant's action for declaratory judgment, as the board was required to give public notice of a meeting, pursuant to the open meetings law.
|
|||||
| GEICO Gen. Ins. Co. v. Pinnacol Assur., Court of Appeals No. 01CA2205,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION ONE, September 12, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Denial of workers' compensation insurer's motion to dismiss was proper, as Colorado Governmental Immunity Act did not apply, where PIP carrier only sought reimbursement for PIP benefits it paid to the insured.
|
|||||
| Harwig v. Downey, Court of Appeals No. 01CA1946,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION FOUR, September 12, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Denial of attorney fees was upheld because plaintiff lessees were not parties to the sales contract and the contract language and circumstances failed to show that the contracting parties intended to benefit the lessees with the attorney fee clause.
|
|||||
| In re Interest of L.F., Court of Appeals No. 01CA2350,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION FOUR, September 12, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred in limiting the application of a statute allowing for an adjustment in child support for visitation-related transportation expenses to those incurred for long distance or interstate travel.
|
|||||
| In re M.G., Court of Appeals No. 01CA0973,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION ONE, September 12, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Denial of the maternal grandmother's petition for adoption and termination of the father's parental rights was affirmed because the finding that adoption was not in the best interest of the children was based on sufficient evidence.
|
|||||
| Logixx Automation v. Lawrence Michels Family Trust, Court of Appeals No. 01CA1222,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION TWO, September 12, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because the damages awarded to companies in connection with their breach of contract and conspiracy claims were supported by the evidence, the judgment was affirmed, even though the conspiracy claim should not have been submitted to the jury.
|
|||||
| P.B.C. v. J.D.M. (In re C.M.), Court of Appeals No. 00CA2313,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION ONE, September 12, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Statute allowing grandmother visitation with her grandchild was not unconstitutional as it was narrowly tailored to avoid impermissibly intruding on parent's rights, but trial court failed to make sufficient findings as to child's best interests.
|
|||||
| People ex rel. A.D., Court of Appeals No. 01CA0881,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION FOUR, September 12, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The trial court did not err in terminating the parent-child legal relationship between the father and his child as the father never asserted his custodial rights, and had failed to manifest a firm intention to resume physical custody.
|
|||||
| People v. Bradbury, Court of Appeals No. 01CA0541,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION ONE, September 12, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court did not violate defendant's due process rights by imposing aggravated range sentence, even though defendant claimed the aggravating factor was not charged in the indictment, submitted to the jury, or proved beyond a reasonable doubt.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
