 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Black Canyon Citizens Coalition v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, Court of Appeals No. 02CA1466,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION THREE, October 9, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The dismissal of a corporation's action against a county was proper where the corporation, the named plaintiff, did not exist, and therefore lacked capacity when the complaint was filed; thus, the action was not timely commenced.
|
|||||
| Clinger v. Hartshorn , Court of Appeals No. 02CA1710,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION ONE, October 9, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where the historical use of a road showed that it had been used by hunters, and a prior owner had been paid to provide guide and outfitting services over the years, a trial court did not err in finding that two neighbors had a prescriptive easement.
|
|||||
| Fonden v. U.S. Home Corp., Court of Appeals No. 02CA1827,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION TWO, October 9, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because the trial court only granted a builder's motion to compel and stay proceedings, but did not dismiss a homeowner's breach of contract action, there was no final judgment from which the homeowner was entitled to appeal.
|
|||||
| Free Speech Def. Comm. v. Thomas, Court of Appeals No. 02CA1692,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION TWO, October 9, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A finding against the committee and members was proper where the district attorney's advisory board was not a local public body or a State public body under the Colorado Open Meetings Law.
|
|||||
| In re K.M.B., Court of Appeals No. 02CA2038,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION FOUR, October 9, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Stepfather had standing to bring a petition for allocation of parental responsibilities, because the applicable statute created an independent basis for standing that extended to any person as long as the child was not in the care of either parent.
|
|||||
| In re Marriage of Pritchett, Court of Appeals No. 02CA1054,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION FOUR, October 9, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because a trial court had relinquished jurisdiction over matters between a mother and father to another state, under the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act the trial court lacked jurisdiction to determine a particular matter.
|
|||||
| Kennedy v. Gillam Dev. Corp., Court of Appeals No. 02CA1427,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION FIVE, October 9, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Buyers who rescinded a contract for the purchase of a home were entitled to damages in the amount of $ 12,000, closing costs, and prejudgment interest; they were not entitled to attorney fees or expected appreciation damages.
|
|||||
| Martinez v. Colo. Dep't of Human Servs., Court of Appeals No. 02CA1880,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION FIVE, October 9, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: State department of social services validly required interim state disability benefits recipient to sign authorization for county's reimbursement from his federal benefits payment, and trial court did not err in refusing to grant declaratory relief.
|
|||||
| People v. Fritschler, Court of Appeals No. 02CA0494,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION THREE, October 9, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Denial of defendant's motion for postconviction relief was affirmed, as mandatory parole did not violate his equal protection rights; defendant, a nonsexual offender, was not similarly situated with sex offenders who served discretionary parole.
|
|||||
| People v. Hoskay, Court of Appeals No. 02CA0394,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION TWO, October 9, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's conviction for sexual assault of a physically helpless victim and public indecency was affirmed; plain language of public indecency statute reflected the intent to make the offense a strict liability crime without a culpable mental state.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
