Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free! Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free! While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
	State Courts - Colorado - October 23, 2006
	Indus. Claim Appeals Office v. Ray, Case No. 05SC632, Case No. 05SC652, Case No. 05SC757, SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, October 23, 2006, Decided View this case - free   Overview: In an apparent conflict between intermediate appellate court's decisions in workers' compensation cases, terminated employees were incorrectly denied health insurance benefits as part of their average weekly wage because they did not purchase continuing health insurance coverage after employment was terminated. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Lane v. Urgitus, Case No. 06SA49, SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, October 23, 2006, Decided View this case - free   Overview: In real estate professionals' dispute over fees, district court did not err in ordering binding arbitration because parties executed agreements to which they consented as members of association, and arbitration was an implied condition of agreements pursuant to Colorado's Uniform Arbitration Act, Colo. Rev. Stat. § 13-22-201 to-239 (2006). Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	People v. Aarness, Case No. 05SC237, SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, October 23, 2006, Decided View this case - free   Overview: Defendant was charged with drugs and weapons violations. Trial court properly denied defendant's motion to suppress evidence pursuant to Fourth Amendment and Colo. Const. art. II, § 7 because, even though two-pronged Payton standard was not met, there were exigent circumstances to justify entry into defendant's home. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Back to Top
	www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us   CopyrightŠ 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.