 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Brotman v. E. Lake Creek Ranch, L.L.P., Case No. 99SC713,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, September 10, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Adjacent landowner did not have standing to challenge action by Colorado Board of Land Commissioners which conveyed section of land State of Colorado received under Colorado Enabling Act.
|
|||||
| Curtis v. Nevens, Case No. 00SA314,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, September 10, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Once a special litigation committee had been appointed, the trial court should have granted a stay of the shareholder derivative suit for a limited time for the committee to complete its work unless compelling facts existed.
|
|||||
| Huddleston v. Bd. of Equalization, Case Nos. SC417, 00SC579, 00SC580, 00SC581,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, September 10, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The personal property tax exemption only provided an exemption for businesses owning not more than $ 2,500 in otherwise non-exempt personal property in the same county, not personal property located at each distinct business location.
|
|||||
| People v. Alvarado, Case No. 00SA252,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, September 10, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Order suppressing evidence was reversed where there was sufficient information in affidavit for finding of probable cause to support search warrant. Officers reasonably could have believed drug lab possessed evidence of criminal activity.
|
|||||
| People v. Braunthal, Case No. 01SA41,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, September 10, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because State's ability to litigate issues was significantly impaired by trial court's ruling suppressing all of the testimony by witnesses who viewed a videotape, and any derivative evidence from the videotape, trial court order was reversed.
|
|||||
| People v. Duncan, Case No. 00SC437,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, September 10, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Order vacating conviction was reserved, when State's failure to disclose was not in bad faith, and a request for continuance to investigate operated to extend the time within which the trial could be commenced by an additional six months.
|
|||||
| People v. Dunlap, Case No. 00SA191,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, September 10, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Denial of defendant's motion for sentence reduction was affirmed when there was no showing that the sentences were clearly erroneous as contrary to the weight of the evidence, and mitigating factors were sufficiently reviewed.
|
|||||
| People v. Palmer, Case No. 00SC326,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, September 10, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where amnesiac defendant was able to understand the proceedings against him and to assist in his own defense, he was not incompetent to stand trial, and he was not entitled to have a second expert examination at State's expense.
|
|||||
| People v. Palomo, Case No. 01SA68,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, September 10, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Drug screenings and tests performed as condition of employment were not medical records, as tests were not done for patient in course of treatment. Trial court abused discretion in disqualifying district attorney and capital crimes unit.
|
|||||
| People v. Saiz, Case No. 99SC513,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, September 10, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court of appeals erred in reversing defendant's conviction for second degree murder; videotaped statements of the defendant's son that were inconsistent with his testimony at trial were within trial court's discretion to exclude.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
