 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Denver Publ. Co. v. Bueno, Case No. 01SC386,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, September 16, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a tort action, Colorado expressly rejected the tort of false light invasion of privacy.
|
|||||
| Gallagher v. Bd. of Trs., Case No. 00SC895,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, September 16, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The trial court wrongly dismissed a defamation action and retaliatory employment suit brought by a former university employee without correctly applying the Colorado Governmental Immunity Act.
|
|||||
| In re DeRose, No. 01SA297,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, September 16, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where a lawyer's conduct constituted a felony, evidenced dishonesty, and called into question his fitness to practice, disbarment was the appropriate sanction, especially where he had been previously discipline for misusing client funds.
|
|||||
| People v. Hardrick, Case No. 02SA67,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, September 16, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A strong government interest in safety justified a police request that a person show his hands when that person walked into an arrest or search scene. If the person refused to comply, a limited seizure to neutralize any threat was justified.
|
|||||
| People v. Harlan, Case No. 01SA356,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, September 16, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court abused discretion when it disqualified petitioner's longtime counsel of choice, where petitioner had not alleged counsel provided ineffective assistance, but asked for appointment of counsel to see whether he could assert such claims.
|
|||||
| Ryder v. Mitchell, Case No. 00SC889,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, September 16, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The duty a therapist owed children was primary and could require disclosure to the parents of the therapist's opinion that one parent's actions were resulting in parental alienation; the therapist owed no duty to the mother.
|
|||||
| Double RL Co. v. Telluray Ranch Props. (In re Double RL Co.), Case No. 01SA273,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, September 23, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Cancellation of appellant ranch's conditional water rights was reversed and remanded because the water court failed to give notice of the cancellation to the ranch as required by statute.
|
|||||
| People v. Triantos, Case No. 02SA97,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, September 23, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The district court's order suppressing evidence in a criminal prosecution was reversed because the statute was permissive and the decision of whether or not to arrest a suspect could precede or follow a custodial arrest.
|
|||||
| People v. Pagnozzi, No. 02PDJ036.,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, PRESIDING DISCIPLINARY JUDGE, September 25, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
