 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Borjas v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., Court of Appeals No. 00CA0964,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION THREE, September 13, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Uninsured motorist insurance policy provided coverage for the protection of a motorist injured by the negligence of a driver who was immune from liability under the Colorado Governmental Immunity Act.
|
|||||
| D.C. Concrete Mgmt., Inc. v. Mid-Century Ins. Co., Court of Appeals No. 99CA1424,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION FOUR, September 13, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where corporation's agent's signature on insurance policy was ambiguous as to the identity of the insured, the policy was properly construed against the insurance company and in favor of coverage for the corporation.
|
|||||
| Giddings v. Indus. Claim Appeals Office, Court of Appeals No. 01CA0077,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION ONE, September 13, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The ALJ was not bound by the gravamen test, and he could have imposed penalties not only for the failure to pay medical bills, but also for the resulting discontinuation of the claimant's psychiatric treatment.
|
|||||
| Hawes v. Colo. Div. of Ins., Court of Appeals No. 00CA1144,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION FOUR, September 13, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The Colorado Commissioner of Insurance properly concluded that he lacked authority to make an award of attorney fees and costs in a request for conversion from a nonprofit corporation to a for-profit stock insurance company.
|
|||||
| In re Marriage of Burke, Court of Appeals No. 01CA0231,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION THREE, September 13, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Stipulation to pay maintenance after dissolution of marriage did not divest the trial court of jurisdiction to hear the ex-husband's motion for modification of the amount of maintenance.
|
|||||
| In re Marriage of Heil, Court of Appeals No. 00CA0946,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION TWO, September 13, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Jurisdiction existed to enter order setting guardian ad litem's fees for representing wife in dissolution proceedings prior to wife's death as authority to enter order did not depend on dissolution proceeding continuing or the marriage statutes.
|
|||||
| In the Interest of K.M.T., Court of Appeals No. 00CA2163,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION ONE, September 13, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court's order awarding child support to child's mother was reversed on appeal, where trial court applied the incorrect statutory provision in calculating the father's income for the purpose of child support.
|
|||||
| Lang v. Colo. Mental Health Inst., Court of Appeals No. 00CA1268,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION ONE, September 13, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The Wage Claim Act did not apply to the Colorado Mental Health Institute as an agency of the state; thus the trial court did not err in dismissing the employee's wage claim brought under the Act.
|
|||||
| McKenzie v. Pope, Court of Appeals No. 00CA1610,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION ONE, September 13, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A grant of permission to use disputed property would have been sufficient to interrupt the running of the statutory period of adverse possession. Additional findings were required on the issue of permission.
|
|||||
| Olson v. Hillside Cmty. Church, Court of Appeals No. 99CA2070,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION TWO, September 13, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Property owners were entitled to a hearing on a church's special use permit. The record did not support a finding that the church acted in good faith; thus the doctrine of relative hardships should not have been applied.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
