 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| McCormick v. Union Pac. Resources Co., No. 99SC243,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, November 28, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgment for respondent railroad was affirmed, as its deed reservations of "other minerals" in land grants to petitioners predecessors unambiguously included oil and gas according to majority rule.
|
|||||
| Welch v. George, No. 99SC964,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, November 28, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In an action arising from an auto accident, the decision that a claim for loss of consortium did not have to meet the threshold of the state no-fault act, and an award of costs to a voluntarily witness was reversed and remanded.
|
|||||
| People v. Lemanski, No. 00PDJ086,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, PRESIDING DISCIPLINARY JUDGE, November 30, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| ALH Holding Co. v. Bank of Telluride, No. 99SC375,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, December 4, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although bank's deed of trust in real property was recorded before that of vendor, bank was not entitled to benefits of recording statute because it had notice of vendor's unrecorded instrument prior to acquiring rights of its own in property.
|
|||||
| People v. Ellison, No. 99SA117,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, December 4, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Dismissal of indictments against defendants for violating that state driving under restraint statute was improper because the statute was not unconstitutional and its violation was a misdemeanor.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
