 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| People v. Copenhaver, No. 99CA0905,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION FIVE, September 14, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Exigent circumstances, concerns about an injured person, justified warrantless entry into apartment. Failure to rule on motion to suppress was harmless error. Use of statements made during plea negotiations was not barred.
|
|||||
| People v. Lopez, No. 99CA0314,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION FIVE, September 14, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because defendant offered only conclusory grounds for his claim, it was not an abuse of discretion to deny defendant's request to withdraw his guilty plea without appointing new counsel to litigate plea withdrawal claims.
|
|||||
| People v. T.B., No. 99CA1605,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION TWO, September 14, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Mother said prior drug use was disability and American With Disabilities Act (ADA) was to be taken into account in terminating parental rights; court stated ADA did not provide defense to termination proceedings; focus was child's welfare.
|
|||||
| People v. Whitaker, No. 98CA2273,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION TWO, September 14, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Protections against search and seizure under Colorado constitution were no broader than those under Fourth Amendment. Special offender law did not create a separate criminal offense for drug distribution offenses to which it applied.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
