 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Brossia v. Rick Constr. L.T.D., Court of Appeals No. 02CA1338,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION ONE, November 6, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In property owners' breach of contract suit against a contractor, the lis pendens the owners recorded after filing suit was invalid as a matter of law, as their original complaint did not claim any relief affecting the title to real property.
|
|||||
| Hartman v. Cmty. Responsibility Ctr., Inc., Court of Appeals No. 02CA1308,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION FOUR, November 6, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court properly directed verdict for an employee, who was also an officer of the employer, on her wage claim, as her employer's allegation that she had breached her fiduciary duty was not a legal justification for not paying her final wages.
|
|||||
| Leprino v. Nationwide Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co., Court of Appeals No. 02CA1863,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION FOUR, November 6, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Developer was sued by homeowners, alleging damage to their homes. Insurer failed to defend or indemnify. Trial court properly granted summary judgment for insurer as developer failed to allege that damage occurred during applicable policy periods.
|
|||||
| People v. Fontes, Court of Appeals No. 02CA0395,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION TWO, November 6, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's convictions for forgery, criminal impersonation, and misdemeanor theft were proper where economic necessity alone did not support a choice of crime.
|
|||||
| People v. Hall, Court of Appeals Nos. 02CA1128 & 02CA1747,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION FIVE, November 6, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a criminal case, the trial court properly sentenced defendant to eight years on a plea of sexual assault and six years on a plea of conspiracy to commit robbery; the robbery sentence was enhanced, as defendant committed the offense while on bond.
|
|||||
| People v. Miller, Court of Appeals No. 02CA1198,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION THREE, November 6, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The trial court's definition of the statutory term "lawfully confined" in defendant's trial for assault on an officer was reviewable. Statute that prohibited spitting on an officer applied to individuals under arrest and confined to a patrol vehicle.
|
|||||
| People v. Simpson, Court of Appeals No. 01CA0322,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION THREE, November 6, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendant kicked in the door of his ex-wife's house, pointed the gun at her head, and fired two shots, the jury properly convicted him of both attempted second-degree murder and first-degree burglary.
|
|||||
| People v. Williams, Court of Appeals No. 01CA1559,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION THREE, November 6, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court properly excluded the victim's prior conviction in defendant's trial for attempted robbery and sexual assault, as the conviction was too remote. Allowing the victim to be asked how she felt about cross-examination was harmless error.
|
|||||
| Summers v. Perkins, Court of Appeals No. 02CA1408,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION FOUR, November 6, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The dismissal of the attorney's action under the Colorado Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act was proper where he lacked standing to assert claims that only the bankruptcy trustee had standing to assert.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
