 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Lazar v. Riggs, No. 03SA030,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, November 10, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: District court erred in denying accident victim's motion to compel disclosure of the driver's statements, where there was no evidence that the statements enjoyed immunity from discovery for documents prepared in anticipation of litigation.
|
|||||
| Tidwell v. City & County of Denver, Case No. 02SC532,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, November 10, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A city was not entitled to immunity under Colorado law, where, after an initial stop, an officer hurriedly followed a fleeing vehicle to apprehend the driver, but did not activate emergency signals, and the fleeing vehicle ran into plaintiff's car.
|
|||||
| Shafer Commer. Seating, Inc. v. Indus. Claim Appeals Office, Court of Appeals No. 02CA2567,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION THREE, November 13, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Administrative law judge did not abuse discretion in precluding an employer from presenting the testimony of a coworker or safety manager in a workers' compensation case because discovery violation was willful.
|
|||||
| Elinoff v. People, Case Number: 03PDJ048,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, PRESIDING DISCIPLINARY JUDGE, November 14, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where a suspended attorney showed by clear and convincing evidence that he complied with all disciplinary orders, was fit to practice law, and was rehabilitated from his previous behavior of bribery, he was reinstated to the practice of law.
|
|||||
| People v. Humphrey, 03PDJ086,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, PRESIDING DISCIPLINARY JUDGE, November 19, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A three-year suspension from the practice of law was appropriate, where an attorney did not report two Colorado DUI convictions to disciplinary authorities and he was convicted of forgery arising from his ownership of two separate driver's licenses.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
