 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Kemper v. Hamilton (In re Title), Case No. 07SA201,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, November 19, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Initiative that proposed the creation of a new environmental conservation agency violated the single subject matter requirement of Colo. Const. art. V, § 1(5.5) and Colo. Rev. Stat. § 1-40-106.5(1)(a); the initiative not only created the new agency but also created public trust standard in which public ownership was favored over economic interest.
|
|||||
| People v. Doke, Case No. 07SA247,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, November 26, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a case in which sheriff's deputies' unsuccessful attempt to serve defendant with civil process culminated in an armed standoff, defendant's alleged menacing of the deputies with a shotgun was a new crime, and evidence of this new crime was admissible even if the new crime was in response to an illegal search.
|
|||||
| Pringle v. Valdez, Case No. 06SC92,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, November 26, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Noneconomic damages of $ 100,000 awarded to passenger for inconvenience, emotional stress, and impairment of the quality of life were included in the meaning of "pain and suffering" under the seat belt defense provision of Colo. Rev. Stat. § 42-4-327(7) and therefore jury should have been instructed that passenger was not wearing seat belt.
|
|||||
| Romero v. People, Case No. 06SC586,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, November 26, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
