 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| In re Marriage of Malewicz, Court of Appeals No. 00CA1737,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION THREE, October 24, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: District court's order denying the mother's motion for relief from judgment in a child support matter was reversed and remanded because the motion was timely in that the time for filing that motion ran from the date of the reviewing judge's order.
|
|||||
| Montemayor v. Jacor Communs., Inc., Court of Appeals No. 00CA1434,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION THREE, October 24, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Under the parties' agreement, the employer had an implied obligation to furnish executive-level work to the employee; failure to provide that work was an actionable breach of contract. Failure to issue the employee stock options was a breach.
|
|||||
| People v. Andracki, Court of Appeals No. 01CA0857,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION THREE, October 24, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The sentence imposed by the trial court was not illegal or unconstitutional because the defendant's guilty plea admitted her status as an escapee and it was the equivalent of having her status proved beyond a reasonable doubt.
|
|||||
| People v. Johnson, Court of Appeals No. 00CA1639,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION THREE, October 24, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's conviction and sentence on the habitual criminal counts were reversed and the case remanded for a new hearing, because the judge who conducted the habitual criminal adjudication was not the same judge who had presided at the trial.
|
|||||
| Silver Dollar Metro. Dist. v. Goltra, Court of Appeals No. 01CA2298,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION FIVE, October 24, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A metropolitan district's condemnation action was premature because the tunnel project in question, which ran over the property owner's land, had not been formally approved; the district was not entitled to immediate possession of the property.
|
|||||
| Spracklin v. Indus. Claim Appeals Office, Court of Appeals No. 02CA0274,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION FOUR, October 24, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Denial of the employee's request for penalties in a workers' compensation matter was affirmed because the request was not filed until after the statute of limitations had expired.
|
|||||
| In re Hickox, Case No. 01SA371,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, October 28, 2002; October 28, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Attorney's criminal conduct reflected adversely on his fitness to practice; proper form of discipline was suspension, especially considering his prior disciplinary record. Aggravating and mitigating factors allowed for a six month suspension.
|
|||||
| Indus. Claim Appeals Office v. Zarlingo, Case No. 01SC710,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, October 28, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An appellate court erred in applying an appellate rule to extend a period to file a notice of appeal by three days because it conflicted with another statute that specified the timing for such an appeal in a workers' compensation case.
|
|||||
| People v. Wayne, No. 02PDJ047,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, PRESIDING DISCIPLINARY JUDGE, November 4, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
