 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Colo. Dep't of Revenue v. Hibbs, Case No. 04SC759,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, November 7, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Reversal of Department of Revenue's revocation of driver's operating license was reversed because record evidenced compliance with then-existing Colo. Rev. Stat. ¿ 42-2-126(3)(b). A verified report pursuant to Colo. Rev. Stat. ¿ 42-2-126(3)(b) did not need to be notarized or otherwise affirmed before a third party, an officer's signature sufficed.
|
|||||
| DeHerrera v. People , Case No. 04SC446,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, November 7, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant had four prior felony convictions, the case at bar involved act of violence, and there was short period of time between defendant's release from prison and commission of new offense. The first and third factors were Blakely-exempt factors, and one Blakely-compliant or Blakely-exempt factor was sufficient to support aggravated sentence.
|
|||||
| Tatum v. People, Case No. 04SA382,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, November 7, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although a headgate was functional, it was unsuitable because it failed to control inflow of water around it, mainly because it was located in swamp area. As headgate failed to serve its function to control the inflow of water at all ordinary stages, landowner was in violation of Colo. Rev. Stat. ¿ 37-84-112(1). Injunctive relief was proper.
|
|||||
| Harris v. Denver Post Corp., Case No. 04SC133,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, November 15, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where sheriff obtained recordings pursuant to search warrant that had not been invalidated and used them to investigate crimes connected with killings at a high school, they were criminal justice records under Colorado's Criminal Justice Records Act and were subject to sheriff's exercise of sound discretion to allow a requested inspection or not.
|
|||||
| People v. Rockwell, Case No. 04SC584,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, November 15, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant was sentenced to mandatory parole following incarceration. Sentence was proper, pursuant to Colo. Rev. Stat. ¿ 17-2-201(a)(5), because there was no factual basis for unlawful sexual behavior, as defendant had claimed.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
