 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Farmers Reservoir & Irrigation Co. v. Consol. Mut. Water Co., Case No. 00SA229,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, October 15, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Water court properly denied petition to retain jurisdiction over consumptive use allocation action; applicable statute was not intended to keep cases open indefinitely or to be a means of review, but to address injurious effects.
|
|||||
| People v. Kaiser, Case No. 01SA58,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, October 15, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although defendant was mildly retarded, waiver of Miranda rights was knowing and intelligent. Officers tailored advisement to her level, repeated them clearly, and her answers were cogent, and she understood the consequences of the waiver.
|
|||||
| Wesp v. Everson, Nos. 01SA98 & 01SA100, Consolidated Cases,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, October 15, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The trial court erred in refusing to conduct a pretrial hearing about whether the defense's attorneys could be called as witnesses and in recognizing a manifest injustice exception to the attorney-client privilege.
|
|||||
| People v. Ventura, No. 01PDJ075.,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, PRESIDING DISCIPLINARY JUDGE, October 18, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| People v. Farrell, Case No. 00SC307,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, October 22, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where co-defendant's inculpatory statement implicated the defendant, the trial court properly admitted the statement against defendant, as the police did not threaten or coerce the co-defendant, nor offer him any special deals.
|
|||||
| Midwest Mut. Ins. Co. v. St. Anthony Hosp., Court of Appeals No. 00CA1667,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION FOUR, October 25, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Hospital was entitled to interest on PIP benefits ultimately paid by insurer, regardless of the insurer's good faith in filing a declaratory judgment action.
|
|||||
| T.L. v. Colo. Dep't of Health Care Policy & Fin., Court of Appeals No. 00CA1691,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION FIVE, October 25, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: State Medicaid law denying a patient's request for a medically necessary hot tub for violated federal Medicaid law.
|
|||||
| Westmark Asset Mgmt. Corp. v. Joseph, Court of Appeals No. 00CA2125,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION ONE, October 25, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Investment advisor was properly denied state licensure where he had been subject to an SEC order that qualified as grounds for denial.
|
|||||
| People v. Baca, No. 01PDJ016.,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, PRESIDING DISCIPLINARY JUDGE, October 26, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
