 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| People v. Cunefare, Case No. 03SC782,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, November 30, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Reversal of defendant's tampering and forgery convictions was error, as defendant attempted to induce the victim to recant testimony and falsified a letter recanting the victim's statement with the intent to defraud the prosecutor.
|
|||||
| People v. Yascavage, Case No. 03SC559,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, November 30, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's conviction for tampering with a victim or witness was properly reversed, as there was no evidence that the victim was under a legal obligation to appear before the tribunal.
|
|||||
| Vigil v. Franklin, Case No. 03SC479,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, November 30, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment for property owners in premises liability action was improper under Colorado's premises liability statute because the statute preempted common law theories of liability, specifically the open and obvious danger defense.
|
|||||
| Div. of Child Support Enforcement v. Indus. Claim Appeals Office , Court of Appeals No.: 04CA0523,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION TWO, December 2, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A finding that a settlement awarded to the claimant in a workers' compensation case was not subject to attachment was improper, where the statute in question represented a procedural amendment and could therefore be applied retroactively.
|
|||||
| Negron v. Golder, Court of Appeals No.: 04CA0444,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION THREE, December 2, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Application of a prison regulation concerning postage and photocopying did not prevent an inmate from serving the Colorado Attorney General; the inmate was not entitled to additional postage at the expense of the Colorado Department of Corrections.
|
|||||
| People v. Banuelos-Landa, Court of Appeals No.: 03CA0619,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION TWO, December 2, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's appeal from the denial of his motions for reconsideration of his sentence were dismissed, as there was no requirement that a motion for reduction of sentence be considered and resolved by the same judge who imposed sentence.
|
|||||
| Turner v. Indus. Claim Appeals Office , Court of Appeals No.: 03CA1958,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION ONE, December 2, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A finding that the employee's injury was not compensable under the quasi-course of employment doctrine was improper, where the employee's travel for an evaluation was directly related to, and proximately caused by, a compensable prior injury.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
