 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Bristol Co., L.P. v. Osman, Court of Appeals No. 06CA1498,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION SIX, December 27, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The dismissal of the client's legal malpractice action was proper because, to the extent that the client alleged that the attorney's negligent advice regarding laches would have caused it harm if the client had sued on the underlying action before the presumption of laches arose, the alleged harm was hypothetical and not susceptible of proof.
|
|||||
| Comcast of Cal./Colo., LLC v. Express Concrete, Inc., Court of Appeals No. 05CA2450,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION ONE, December 27, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Human Mgmt. Servs. v. Mediacell, Inc., Court of Appeals No. 06CA 1904,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION ONE, December 27, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| J.D. Padilla & JDP, LLC v. Ghuman, Court of Appeals No. 06CA2021,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION FIVE, December 27, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Jenkins v. Haymore, Court of Appeals No. 06CA0846,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION SIX, December 27, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Macurdy v. Faure, Court of Appeals No. 07CA0339,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION THREE, December 27, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| People ex rel. D.Y., Court of Appeals No. 07CA1434,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION THREE, December 27, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| People ex rel. I.L., Court of Appeals No. 07CA 1066,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION FIVE, December 27, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| People v. Chavez, Court of Appeals No. 05CA2392,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION TWO, December 27, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: District court did not err by allowing testimony that defendant had refused to consent to search of his apartment and by allowing prosecutor to argue in closing that his refusal to consent was evidence that he knew illegal drugs were in apartment because such admission did not violate defendant's due process rights or violate Colo. R. Evid. 403.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
