LexisNexis
  
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - Colorado - December 5, 2002

  
Bd. of County Comm'Rs v. City & County of Broomfield, Court of Appeals No. 01CA2333, COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION TWO, December 5, 2002, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: If the new city and county were not allowed to retain property taxes due in the current year, it would lack revenue to provide required citizens services in that year, which was not a reasonable interpretation of the constitutional amendment.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Jarosinski v. Indus. Claim Appeals Office, Court of Appeals No. 02CA0332, COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION TWO, December 5, 2002, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: The denial to reopen the claimant's workers' compensation claim was proper, where her litigation stress was an intervening event, not a compensable consequence of the industrial injury.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
People v. Benavidez, CASE NO. 025C730, SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, December 5, 2002, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
People v. Scofield, Court of Appeals No. 01CA1292, COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION FIVE, December 5, 2002, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Defendant was precluded from challenging the propriety of her sentence on appeal after her guilty plea to child abuse, because the sentence imposed was within a range agreed upon by the parties pursuant to a plea agreement.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
People v. St. James, Court of Appeals No. 99CA2069, COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION FOUR, December 5, 2002, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Defendant was properly convicted of sexual exploitation of child, where prosecution was predicated upon his photographing child (his 17-year-old adoptive niece) engaged in sexually explicit conduct, even though he did not develop film.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
People v. Strean, Court of Appeals No. 01CA0685, COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION ONE, December 5, 2002, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Defendant's sexual assault on a child convictions were proper where, although a juror's childhood abuse constituted a possible source of bias, her responses showed no animosity or bias toward defendant.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
People v. Willcoxon, Court of Appeals No. 01CA0524, COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION FIVE, December 5, 2002, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Allowing jurors to take their notebooks home during a criminal trial did not amount to a structural error requiring an automatic reversal, as it was not a fundamental error that pervasively prejudiced the entire course of the proceedings.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

 www.lexisnexis.com  |  About LexisNexis  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Customer Support  |  Contact Us
  Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.