 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Becker v. Becker (In re Estate of Becker), No. 99CA2251,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION ONE, December 7, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Retroactive application of Colorado's divorce revocation statute was not unconstitutional because former wife's right to recover did not occur until decedent's death, after the effective date of the statute.
|
|||||
| Boryla v. Pash, No. 99CA2042,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION A, December 7, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Denial of request for prejudgment interest on costs award was affirmed as the mandate from the appellate court failed to direct the trial court with respect to the award of interest. Thus, the court had no jurisdiction to award interest.
|
|||||
| Hill v. DeWitt (In re Estate of DeWitt), No. 99CA1349,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION FOUR, December 7, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Personal representative, as plaintiff, could not challenge ex-spouse's standing. Retroactive application of Colorado's divorce revocation statute would have substantially interfered with respondent's expectancy interest.
|
|||||
| James E. Freemyer, P.C. v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office, No. 00CA0814,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION THREE, December 7, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because the specific statute exempting workers' compensation benefits from debts prevailed over any general right under attorney lien statute, lawyer did not have enforceable lien against claimant, his employer, or insurer.
|
|||||
| Lewis v. Columbus Invs., No. 99CA1435,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION ONE, December 7, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Treasurer's deed issued to defendant was invalid and plaintiffs were entitled to judgment in their favor because treasurer failed to provide lenders with notice of defendant's application for a treasurer's deed as required by statute.
|
|||||
| Morris v. Askeland Enters., No. 99CA2491,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION A, December 7, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Sole shareholder's prior deposition and accountant's testimony concerning corporation's insolvency was sufficient evidence to support judgment. Neither punitive damages nor attorney fees were available under fraudulent conveyance statute.
|
|||||
| Sereff v. Waldman, No. 99CA1497, No. 99CA1193,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION THREE, December 7, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because the actions of resident and doctor fell within the operation of a public hospital for purposes of the immunity statute, the trial court properly concluded that governmental immunity had been waived.
|
|||||
| People v. Lucero, CASE NO. 00SC130,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, December 11, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| People v. McFlynn, No. 00PDJ075,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, PRESIDING DISCIPLINARY JUDGE, December 11, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
