 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Cottman v. Aurora Pub. Schs. Bd. of Educ., No. 00CA1588,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION A, December 21, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Petition to review public school teacher termination proceeding dismissed for want of jurisdiction because 20-day period to contest ruling was triggered by entry of respondent's order, not petitioner's receipt of the order.
|
|||||
| Mauldin v. Panella, No. 00CA0124,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION THREE, December 21, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Subdivision covenants could be amended only at intervals determined in the original 1962 covenants; therefore original committee, rather than new one, had authority to act on proposed commercial use of plaintiff's property.
|
|||||
| People v. Dixon, No. 99CA1179,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION FIVE, December 21, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where vehicle had arrived at destination, driver had been contacted for minor traffic violations, and officer had no reasonable suspicion that defendant was involved in criminal activity, arrest and search of defendant was unlawful.
|
|||||
| People v. Gregor, No. 99CA0703,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION FOUR, December 21, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In appeal of conviction of driving while license revoked, trial court did not err in giving jury instructions, which listed every element of the offense, and defendant had expressly consented to instruction.
|
|||||
| People v. Martin, No. 98CA0429,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION THREE, December 21, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Colorado defendant who did not show he was still drunk at time of waiving rights, several hours after arrest, could not show that trial court's failure sua sponte to reconsider suppression denial was not harmless.
|
|||||
| People v. O'Neal, No. 99CA0435,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION FIVE, December 21, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's conviction of reckless manslaughter was upheld because the trial court did not abuse its discretion, the sentence was supported by the evidence, and the officer had probable cause to arrest before the statements were made.
|
|||||
| People v. Roca, No. 00CA1449,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION A, December 21, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant was not entitled to a hearing on his motion for an appeal bond pending review of denial of his motion for release. The court also denied defendant's motion for an appeal bond.
|
|||||
| People v. Seaney, No. 99CA0628,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION FOUR, December 21, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Denial of defendant's motion for postconviction relief seeking reduction in sentence for burglary was affirmed. Only remedy available to defendant for lack of mandatory parole advisement was withdrawal of his guilty plea.
|
|||||
| People v. Trujillo, No. 98CA2575,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION ONE, December 21, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Prosecutor could not use defendant's suppressed statements to rebut his mother, wife, and attorney's testimony that he did not remember the court setting. Thus, his conviction for violating bail bond conditions was vacated.
|
|||||
| People v. Wirsching, No. 99CA0977,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION TWO, December 21, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An order that a challenge to a sentence was not ripe was reversed. Because the defendant had not been informed what the maximum period his parole might be, the matter was remanded to permit the defendant a chance to withdraw his guilty plea.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
