 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Pfenninger v. Exempla, Inc., No. 99CA0635,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION THREE, December 21, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because the appellant physicians' tort defamation claim arose out side the professional review process, appellants did not have to exhaust their administrative remedies prior to filing their suit in the trial court.
|
|||||
| Pierson v. Black Canyon Aggregates, Inc., No. 99CA1626,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION THREE, December 21, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Party without ownership interest or exclusive possession was not landowner for purposes of premises liability statute; governmental resolution requiring contracting party to obtain liability insurance was not waiver of governmental immunity.
|
|||||
| Powell v. City of Colorado Springs, No. 99CA1403,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION THREE, December 21, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's motion to dismiss plaintiff's wrongful death suit was properly denied, as plaintiff's evidence concerning the condition of the area around the accident site established that governmental immunity had been waived.
|
|||||
| Truck Ins. Exch. v. Eagle River Water & Sanitation Dist., No. 99CA2428,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION TWO, December 21, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court properly concluded that water and sanitation district was not liable for damage caused by a water leak. Intent of parties was that district be responsible for repair only when the meter itself malfunctioned.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
