 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| People v. Norton, Court of Appeals No. 00CA0352,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION TWO, December 20, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendant's attempted escape charge and confinement therefore were a direct result of the same transaction from which 18 month attempted escape sentence flowed, he was entitled to presentence confinement credit.
|
|||||
| People v. Rios, Court of Appeals No. 99CA2083,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION FIVE, December 20, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Probable cause existed for a custodial arrest, and the search did not exceed the scope of a search incident to a custodial arrest, but the special offender count did not require a separate sentence.
|
|||||
| People v. Ware, Court of Appeals No. 00CA1954,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION A, December 20, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Juvenile felony charge was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because there was no exception to the statute of limitations for a juvenile who misrepresented his age and lead authorities to file charges in a court lacking jurisdiction.
|
|||||
| People v. Watson, Court of Appeals No. 99CA0779,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION FIVE, December 20, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court did not err in giving jury Allen instruction although it knew the jury was deadlocked 11 to 1, and it was late in the afternoon two days before Christmas.
|
|||||
| Roberts v. Adams, Court of Appeals No. 00CA2288,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION ONE, December 20, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Upon the failure of two conditions precedent, a homeowner was not required to perform its contractual obligation to pay builders $ 200,000 pursuant to a promissory note.
|
|||||
| Spencer v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, Court of Appeals No. 00CA2301,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION FOUR, December 20, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court lacked jurisdiction to consider postjudgment motion filed by county more than 60 days after filing first motion, and the new motion did not extend deadline because it was filed more than 15 days after judgment.
|
|||||
| Woollems v. Indus. Claim Appeals Office, Court of Appeals No. 01CA0656,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION TWO, December 20, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where unemployment benefits claimant was overpaid, as he willfully failed to disclose other earnings, statute required that he repay the total amount of overpayment plus a penalty of 50 percent, without consideration of his financial hardship.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
