|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
State Courts -
Connecticut - January 3, 2000
|
| |
Capo v. Warden, 546661,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, January 3, 2000, Decided , January 3, 2000, Filed
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
Darien Country Club v. Classic Roofing Co., FSTCV 950145817,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD - NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, January 3, 2000, Decided , January 3, 2000, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Motions to strike roofer's cross claims against manufacturer of roofing materials were granted because claims for breach of warranties of fitness and merchantability were not brought under Uniform Commercial Code.
|
|
| |
Deleo v. Reed, CV 990172435,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD - NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, January 3, 2000, Decided , January 3, 2000, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Plaintiffs' claims for intentional and negligent infliction of emotional distress were struck because defendant cut down trees and fence that plaintiffs alleged they owned by adverse possession.
|
|
| |
Demelis v. Lyon & Billard Co., CV 940367841S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 3, 2000, Decided , January 3, 2000, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: In breach of contract action, third-party defendants' motion to dismiss denied; the statute of limitations defense was procedure in nature, and thus, must be specially pleaded and cannot be raised by a motion to dismiss.
|
|
| |
Diaz v. Warden, 551420,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, January 3, 2000, Decided , January 3, 2000, Filed
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
Diaz v. Warden, 546768,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, January 3, 2000, Decided , January 3, 2000, Filed
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
Gersten v. Gersten, FA 930314347S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, AT DANBURY, January 3, 2000, Decided , January 3, 2000, Filed
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Hat City Commons v. Connecticut Hous. Fin. Auth., CV 970326706S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, AT DANBURY, January 3, 2000, Decided , January 3, 2000, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Complaint could be amended where plaintiff's request would not constitute unreasonable delay, mislead defendant, cause unfair advantage to plaintiff, or confuse issue.
|
|
| |
Ortiz v. Gates, 551249,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, January 3, 2000, Decided , January 3, 2000, Filed
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
