 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Andretta v. Rudig, CV99065340,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, AT MILFORD, January 2, 2001, Decided , January 2, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Connecticut defendant seeking third-party apportionment relief could not couch products liability claim in negligence language to avoid bar against apportionment in products liability cases.
|
|||||
| Coughlin v. City of Waterbury, (AC 20102),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 2, 2001, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Motion to dismiss negligence action on ground that trial court lacked jurisdiction was improperly granted where issue of maintenance of sidewalk remained in dispute and resolution of issue was determinative of subject matter jurisdiction.
|
|||||
| Dean v. Dean, FA990364783S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, January 2, 2001, Decided , January 2, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court issued its findings and orders dissolving the parties' 13 year marriage and dividing their assets and liabilities. The parties' assets included interest in a business. The property distribution included alimony.
|
|||||
| Dean v. Nowacki, CV990081044,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF LITCHFIELD, AT LITCHFIELD, January 2, 2001, Decided , January 2, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court denied defendant's motion to strike plaintiff's complaint; construing the facts most favorably to the plaintiff, the complaint set forth a separate count alleging common law recklessness.
|
|||||
| Esposito v. Town of Hamden Planning & Zoning Comm'n, CV990433344S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 2, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Zoning commission's decision granting an amendment to the zoning regulations to expand special permit uses to include extended stay hotels did not constitute spot zoning; community as a whole benefitted.
|
|||||
| Fairfax Props. v. Lyons, X06CV000158234S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, January 2, 2001, Decided , January 2, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over the claims brought against defendant directors, because the action was not unauthorized by the corporation, its directors or its 10 percent shareholders.
|
|||||
| Fitzpatrick v. De Montigny, CV9662431S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, AT ROCKVILLE, January 2, 2001, Decided , January 2, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court was not entitled to relieve plaintiffs from contract obligations because plaintiffs believed that the contract proved to be an improvident agreement. However, defendants were entitled to liquidated damages due to contract breach.
|
|||||
| Gangemi v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals, (SC 16208),
SUPREME COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 2, 2001, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant erred in denying plaintiffs' application to remove a no-rental condition on their property imposed by a prior zoning variance; the condition violated a strong public policy against restrictions on free alienability of property.
|
|||||
| Godwin v. Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co., CV970397259S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 2, 2001, Decided , January 2, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court struck a homeowner's insurer's indemnity claim against a tort defendant because the insurer's liability to the homeowner was in contract not tort, and allowed the insurer's subrogation claim against the tort defendant.
|
|||||
| Hefti v. Comm'n on Human Rights & Opportunities, (AC 19085),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 2, 2001, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Dismissal of appeal from adverse determination on alleged age discrimination claim by commission on human rights and opportunities for want of jurisdiction upheld where failure to submit filing fee rendered appeal untimely.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
