 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Bennett Restructuring Fund, L.P. v. Hamburg, (X02)CV010167682S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, COMPLEX LITIGATION DOCKET AT WATERBURY, January 2, 2003, Decided , January 2, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court granted corporate officials' motion to strike secondary market bond buyers' untrue public report action for negligence and breaches of affirmative duty of full disclosure and fiduciary duty, but not fraud and negligent misrepresentation.
|
|||||
| Best v. D'Amario-Rossi, CV990334718S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, AT DANBURY, January 2, 2003, Decided , January 2, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The father of a child killed by her negligent and incompetent mother could not pursue a damages action against child welfare officials based on Connecticut's constitution or federal civil rights laws.
|
|||||
| Brian's Floor Covering Supplies v. Spring Meadow Elderly Apts., 375810,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, January 2, 2003, Decided , January 2, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The corporations' motion to dismiss a supplier's action was denied because the corporations missed the 30-day deadline where they had filed their initial appearance in a prejudgment remedy motion over one year before the motion to dismiss.
|
|||||
| Caballero v. Warden, CV003178,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, January 2, 2003, Decided , January 2, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Petitioner's Eighth Amendment right to be free from cruel and unusual punishment was not violated where he was placed in restraints during recreation period since there was no evidence of physical force or unnecessary and wanton infliction of pain.
|
|||||
| Corey v. Corey, FA920112507S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, January 2, 2003, Decided , January 2, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where a former husband intentionally reduced his income and actively changed his lifestyle, the former husband was not entitled to a reduction or termination of his alimony obligations.
|
|||||
| In the Interests of Eric B., No Docket Number,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, JUVENILE MATTERS, January 2, 2003, Decided , January 2, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where father was heavy drinker, and was both physically and emotionally abusive to his child, and child had serious developmental and physical handicaps that required stable home, court terminated father's parental rights, with the father's consent.
|
|||||
| Rocky Hill Assocs. P'Ship v. Open Space & Conservation Comm'n, HHBCV980492657,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, January 2, 2003, Decided , January 2, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Once a court had sustained a developer's appeal from denial of a permit to develop in a wetlands area, and a mandate had issued to grant the permit, the land use agency could not attach conditions to the permit issued.
|
|||||
| Tina C. v. Christopher H., FA940119611S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, January 2, 2003, Decided , January 2, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Tirella v. Oxford Bd. of Assessment Appeals, CV01075185,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, AT MILFORD, January 2, 2003, Decided , January 2, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The dismissal of a property owner's appeal from a town's valuation of her property was proper because the owner did not meet her burden of showing that the property was overvalued.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
