 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Anderson v. Warden, CV064001028S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, AT ROCKVILLE, January 2, 2007, Decided , January 2, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An inmate's habeas corpus petition was premature because it stated that the matter was scheduled for trial in another judicial district, in which counsel had been allowed to withdraw and the trial court found the inmate waived and/or forfeited his right to counsel, so dismissal under Conn. Gen. Prac. Book, R. Super. Ct. § 23-29(4) was required.
|
|||||
| Broadnax v. City of New Haven, CV980412193S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 2, 2007, Decided , January 2, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court awarded a firefighter front pay and loss of pension value on his claim under 42 U.S.C.S. § 1983 that he was deprived of his right to a promotion because he did not fail to try to mitigate his damage claims, nor was it established that, given his circumstances, he could.
|
|||||
| Coppa v. Soh-Tan, CV054003679S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, AT MILFORD, January 2, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court denied the parent and child's summary judgment motion, as application of collateral estoppel doctrine would be unfair to daycare business and daycare owner; prior litigation involved administrative forum considering license of daycare business while parents and child's current lawsuit could result in money damages and social stigma.
|
|||||
| Crescimanno v. Crescimanno, FA054003279S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WINDHAM, AT PUTNAM, January 2, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Dissolution of marriage was granted in a 36-year marriage. The parties' assets were distributed and an order regarding the husband's state pension and the parties' health insurance responsibilities was entered.
|
|||||
| Evanuska v. City of Danbury, AC 27263,
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 2, 2007, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: When volunteer firefighters were injured while attending a "work night" to repair a fire station roof, they had not been engaged in "fire duties" under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 7-314(a) and thus were not eligible for compensation under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 7-314a(a). Because they had not been ordered to attend the work night, it was not a fire duty.
|
|||||
| Fallon v. The Matworks, X01CV030185487S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, COMPLEX LITIGATION DOCKET AT WATERBURY, January 2, 2007, Decided , January 2, 2007, Memorandum Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A summary judgment motion by the seller of a carpet tile which allegedly caused a plaintiff's fall was denied because the allegation against the seller was that the product itself, not the installation of the product, was defective and caused the injuries and thus sufficiently stated a claim of strict product liability.
|
|||||
| Fazzone, Baillie, Ryan & Seadale, LLC v. Baillie, Hall & Hershman, P.C., CV040833143S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, January 2, 2007, Decided , January 2, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In an action by a former law firm and its remaining attorneys against the former attorney who dissociated himself and his related entities, jury verdicts for each party on a variety of claims did not warrant relief under post-judgment motions, as each damage award was properly based on the evidence before the jury.
|
|||||
| Fica v. Fica, FA030182137S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, January 2, 2007, Decided , January 2, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: While the court was vested with the authority to allow modification of a husband's alimony payments under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 46b-86, and the recent amendment of Conn. Gen. Stat. § 46b-215e did not apply, pursuant to the parties' separation agreement, the husband was granted a hearing to seek a modification based on his incarceration.
|
|||||
| In re Kerwyn F., T11CP06012530A,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, AT ROCKVILLE, January 2, 2007, Decided , January 2, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Preponderance of the evidence indicated that the best interests of a child who had been residing in a treatment facility under a sexual assault related delinquency commitment, would be served by an additional six months protective supervision so that he could continue individual and family therapy to deal with his sex-related acting out issues.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
